Ever wondered why some students, even those with a good grasp of grammar and vocabulary, hesitate to speak in your language class, while others jump right in? Or why a student might seem engaged one day and withdrawn the next? While linguistic knowledge is crucial, it’s only part of the puzzle. Two powerful theories from Second Language Acquisition (SLA) shed light on the “invisible forces” – the emotions, attitudes, and confidence levels – that significantly impact our students’ learning and participation: Stephen Krashen’s Affective Filter Hypothesis and Peter MacIntyre’s Willingness to Communicate (WTC).
Understanding these concepts can transform how we approach language teaching and help us create classrooms where more students feel empowered to learn and use their new language.
Feeling Safe to Learn: Krashen’s Affective Filter (1982)
Imagine an invisible shield or filter around your students. According to Stephen Krashen, this “affective filter” is influenced by their emotions and attitudes.
- What is it? It’s a metaphorical barrier. When a student feels anxious, unmotivated, or lacks self-confidence, the filter goes UP. This high filter blocks the language input they receive (even if it’s perfectly understandable!) from being fully processed and absorbed for subconscious learning (what Krashen calls ‘acquisition’).
- How it works: Conversely, when a student feels relaxed, motivated, and confident, the filter is LOW. Language input can pass through easily, leading to better acquisition.
- Key Factors Raising the Filter:
- High Anxiety: Fear of making mistakes, judgment from peers or the teacher, test anxiety.
- Low Motivation: Lack of interest in the language, culture, or learning process.
- Low Self-Confidence: Feeling inadequate or believing they simply aren’t “good” at languages.
What This Means for Your Classroom:
Our primary goal should be to lower this affective filter. - Create a Low-Anxiety Zone: Foster a supportive atmosphere where mistakes are seen as learning opportunities, not failures. Use pair and group work to reduce individual pressure.
- Boost Confidence: Provide positive reinforcement, acknowledge effort, design tasks where students can experience success, and celebrate progress, not just perfection.
- Nurture Motivation: Connect lessons to students’ interests, show the real-world value of the language, and foster positive attitudes towards the target language and its speakers.
Choosing to Speak: MacIntyre’s Willingness to Communicate (WTC) (1998)
While the Affective Filter focuses on how emotions impact language input and subconscious learning, MacIntyre’s WTC model zeroes in on what influences a student’s decision to actually use the language – to speak or write – especially when they have a choice. - What is it? WTC is defined as a learner’s “readiness to enter into discourse at a particular time with a specific person or persons.” It’s the final step before communication actually happens. Having the ability isn’t enough; students need to be willing.
- It’s Complex and Situational: WTC isn’t just a fixed personality trait. It changes depending on the situation, the topic, who they are talking to, and how they feel in that moment.
- Key Influences: Many factors contribute, but a major one is L2 Self-Confidence. This combines:
- Perceived Competence: How skilled they believe they are in the L2.
- Lack of Anxiety: Feeling comfortable and not overly nervous about using the language.
- Other factors include motivation, attitudes towards the language community, and the specific social situation.
What This Means for Your Classroom:
We need to foster not just linguistic skills, but also the confidence and desire to use them. - Build Communicative Confidence: Focus on fluency and communication alongside accuracy. Design tasks that scaffold from controlled practice to freer, more authentic communication.
- Provide Opportunities, Not Just Demands: Create genuine reasons for students to communicate with each other. Information gaps, problem-solving tasks, discussions, and role-plays can help.
- Manage Anxiety Specifically Around Speaking: Acknowledge that speaking can be stressful. Start with lower-stakes activities (pair work before whole class) and give positive feedback on communicative effort.
- Foster Positive Group Dynamics: Ensure a respectful classroom climate where students feel comfortable interacting with their peers in the L2.
Connecting the Dots: Filter In, Willingness Out
Think of it this way: Krashen’s Affective Filter deals with letting the language in for learning. MacIntyre’s WTC deals with the complex decision-making process involved in letting the language out through communication. Both highlight that how students feel is intrinsically linked to how they learn and whether they choose to participate. Lowering anxiety and building confidence helps on both fronts – allowing input to be absorbed effectively and increasing the likelihood students will choose to use the language they know.
By understanding and applying insights from both the Affective Filter Hypothesis and Willingness to Communicate, we can move beyond simply teaching grammar rules and vocabulary lists. We can become architects of supportive, motivating environments where students feel safe enough to learn and brave enough to speak.
Want to Learn More? Key Readings for Educators:
Here are some foundational texts and key papers if you’d like to delve deeper into these concepts:
On Krashen’s Affective Filter Hypothesis: - Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Pergamon Press. (This book provides a comprehensive overview of Krashen’s Monitor Model, including the Affective Filter).
- Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning. Pergamon Press. (An earlier work laying out the core hypotheses).
On MacIntyre’s Willingness to Communicate (WTC): - MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a second language: A situational model of L2 confidence and affiliation. The Modern Language Journal, 82(4), 545-562. (This is the seminal paper outlining the WTC model).
- MacIntyre, P. D. (2007). Willingness to communicate in the second language: Understanding the pyramid of WTC. Language Learning, 57(S1), 103-141. (A later article offering further development and reflection on the model).
- Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The Psychology of the Language Learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (While covering broader individual differences, this book discusses motivation and confidence extensively, linking well with WTC concepts).


Leave a comment